aircraft

wwii fighter train strikes and air-to-air kills, ETO, enhanced video

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.


Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

You Might Also Like

29 Comments

  • Reply
    ActiveStorage
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    crazy.. so much explosive energy in those steam engines..

  • Reply
    telemantid
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    I've been on a bit of a gun-camera bender lately…I've noticed that these pilots are either really good shots, or really poor shots, with not much in-between.
    There is some fine shooting in this vid.

  • Reply
    fishyc150
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    If memory serves allies were "authorised" to shoot jet pilots bailing out or under canopy. They were a valuable asset and to be denied to the Luftwaffe at every chance…

  • Reply
    bmgm3
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    17 secs in is an amazing great burst on target for a good few seconds right up the line of the train and importantly, taking out the boiler too.

  • Reply
    Elthenar
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Schredder222 Are you talking about the part at the end? If so, he wasn't strafing the pilot, he was strafing the ME-163 which was very likely still fully functional. Those were rocket planes, they only flew for a few minutes and when they ran out of fuel they just glided back down to the ground. Shooting them after they ran out of fuel and either gliding down or on the ground was just about the only way the Allied fighters could kill one.

  • Reply
    VoelligHarmlos
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    at 1.15 that is a german "Kraftei" 🙂

  • Reply
    Schredder222
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    Real honorable strafing a downed pilot….

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    By the way, I just read some of the comments below and realized that "Robert111" intentionally avoided hitting the "reply" button so that I wouldn't see his response. And he wants to talk about "cowards"??? Wow, what a hypocrite!

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Toddinfantry

    Hey, thanks for bringing this back to me! What a blast from the past. I forgot all about owning this sumbag, but it's great to re-read the conversation and enjoy a good laugh. I'm also happy to have entertained you.

    Isn't it amazing how anti-Americanism often seems to go hand in hand with ignorance?

  • Reply
    Maria Cornwallis
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @dividednation44 I grant that you are entitled to your opinion and I presume you live in a land of free speech but there is no need to swear at me, you don't even know me you ignorant c**t (please notice the correct way of spelling "ignorant") Just for your information they were being gassed at Auschwitz at the rate of 2500 per hour , that's according to Reinhard Heydrich, and he should know. Look him up if you don't know who he was. Only losers swear in discussions.

  • Reply
    DrakenPL
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @MrGoldsable

    +1

  • Reply
    Maria Cornwallis
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111 Cowardly acts:- invading Neutral unarmed countries like Poland, Holland , Belgium, Denmark and Norway. Bombing cities and killing thousands of unarmed civilians (started by the Germans). Straffing fleeing Belgian and French refugees.. Bombing my fathers house in Whitley Bay, But most of all GASSING 6,000,000 MEN, WOMEN AND BABIES. I would have shot any german plane and then the pilot suspended in his parachute. I'm no coward, I am judge , jury and executioner.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    LOL!!! Hahahhhaa!!! How long this stuff lasts in court. IN COURT!!!! HAHAHAHAHHAA!!! HAHAHHAAA!!!! We going to court now?? HAHHAHHAAA!!! Damn, I can barely sit still in my chair over that one. HAHAHA!!!
    "Silly boy"????? I sincerely hope you are a girl to be flirting like that. If not, I'm straight, so save your flirts for your fellow queers.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    What's a "resonding" by the way? You make a ton of spelling mistakes, silly boy.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    "The "keep resonding" ploy is not working"

    What ploy? I asked you to keep coming back and responding, and you are!

    "You, like the coward shooting in this video, would only attack someone unarmed when their back is turned."

    Again, where's the proof. Oh cool, you have none. Silly boy, you should be a comedian!

    "You already implied that in your comments."

    LOLZ, he said she said. You know how long that kinda stuff lasts in court? Not long. Keep responding! I love it!

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm The "keep resonding" ploy is not working for you, sucker. I would have thought you would have realized that after three times? No? LOL! A coward by any other appearance is still a coward. You are a coward. I'm not sure how else I can help you understand this. You, like the coward shooting in this video, would only attack someone unarmed when their back is turned. You already implied that in your comments. Sorry.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    Again, you do not know me personally, what I look like, or if I am a coward or not. I am now falling out of my chair laughing at you. You have got to be the stupidest person on YouTube, as evidenced by your comments.

    Please, keep responding. I can't get enough of your mindless psychobabble. It's hilarious.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm LOL! You certainly are a stupid one, sucker. Why would you think I need to know your name? Fucktard! LOL! It is obvious by your arguments and personality that you are a dastardly coward. It does not matter what they named your ugly ass! Hahaha! By any other name you would still be a dastardly coward.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    Haha, that's your best comeback? "NO! You are!"? Again, thanks for the laugh. With every silly response you make, I get a rush. Please keep responding.

    I would shoot an unarmed man, woman, or child in the back? Got proof? LMFAO, you don't even know my name, son. Please keep responding.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm I'm going to give you a helping hand here sucker, the "trolling" thing just isn't working for you – at all. I would think that one look at my channel comments and you would realize you're not going to somehow send me reeling by yelling "troll." Instead you appear exactly as you are… a sucker and a coward. You, like the coward shooting in this video, would shoot an unarmed man, woman, or child in the back. Scum.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    You need to go to your local book store and pick up a gem called "Trolling for Dummies", because you're really not good at this. I've ran into some wicked trolls on YouTube before and they would tear you apart in a heartbeat. Not only did you incorrectly spell "aircraft", but you claimed something as a fact which you have no proof of. I laughed very hard at your stupidity for a good minute or two. You are providing me with entertainment. Please keep dancing for me, puppet.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm Sorry sucker, your analogies continue to FAIL. Shooting at a gliding out-of-commission aricraft as it lands is a cowardly act. You don't see anything wrong with it because you are in fact a coward.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    Spoken like a typical troll. Are you aware of what an "ad hominem" fallacy is?

    Let's break this down: The Komet pilot just killed some Allied airmen. Because he is gliding back, he cannot be shot? So, if I kill members of your family but then discard my weapon, you won't shoot me? Bullshit.

    You're not even a good troll, you're pathetic at this! I suggest you practice a little, then come back.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm You really can't tell the difference? Are you truly that stupid or just an ass clown? When the Komet is attacking the bombers, they have engines running and can shoot back with any number of guns. It is always a cowardly act to shoot a plane when it is gliding down or otherwise out of commission. Then again, the U.S. has a LONG STANDING history of cowardice, going way back to the battles with Native Americans – attacking women/children when warriors are out, spreading disease,etc.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    Again, the Komet pilot's objective was to shoot down Allied bombers. That means killing those airmen. In turn, the Allied pilot shot it down so that it may not return to the skies and kill more of his brothers. Somehow, you classify the Allied pilot as "cowardly", but not the Komet pilot for similar actions.

    At first, I would suspect that you are deranged from being raised poorly, or just uneducated. Then I looked at your channel and saw you are a well-documented troll…

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @cavalrytm Yes, I suppose he was fair game for a coward.

  • Reply
    Robert111
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @mitchblack Sick wacko jihadist.

  • Reply
    cavalrytm
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    @Robert111

    Right after the Komet pilot killed several Allied bomber pilots… he was fair game.

  • Reply
    mitch black
    March 24, 2017 at 8:37 am

    God bless our WWII hero aviators.

  • Leave a Reply