nuclear

Russia’s Floating Nuclear Plant Dubbed “Floating Chernobyl” by Critics As It Heads Out to Sea

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.



Russia’s controversial floating nuclear power plant is heading out for its first sea voyage.

The floating plant, the Akademik Lomonosov, was towed out of the St Petersburg shipyard where it was constructed.

It is to be towed through the Baltic Sea and around the northern tip of Norway to Murmansk, where its reactors are to be loaded with nuclear fuel.

Learn More:

Your Support of Independent Media Is Appreciated:

Btc- 1Nmcbook8TwAdtZHsMdVxRtjBnyrSArDH5

www.undergroundworldnews.com

My Other Youtube Channel-

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

You Might Also Like

35 Comments

  • Reply
    Pat Gray
    April 29, 2018 at 2:06 pm

    Lord please help us now! People never learn. On the other hand ever learning but never learning truth. Man is selfish never thinking about he brother. Lord save us.

  • Reply
    Sidney Boudro
    April 29, 2018 at 2:44 pm

    What about the United States Navy 's nuclear subs? Aren't they dangerous as well?

  • Reply
    gary granato
    April 29, 2018 at 3:16 pm

    fukashima anywhere in the world

  • Reply
    Michael Denton II
    April 29, 2018 at 3:33 pm

    Wormwood… WORMWOOD!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
    iLLOpeRaTor1
    April 29, 2018 at 3:34 pm

    Similar to nuclear subs I guess

  • Reply
    Bhaven 01
    April 29, 2018 at 4:32 pm

    This is nuts.
    Way too much risk to have this in and over our Oceans.

    Puts the globe at Risk without permission.
    Fukushima?

  • Reply
    333crypta
    April 29, 2018 at 5:28 pm

    Genius really. Boatloads (pun intended) of electricity wherever its needed. Just need to be very careful with it. I would equip that puppy with some S-400. Hopefully they have it shielded and all that. I would think there would be low risk of meltdown since it is surrounded by water. But
    I'm no nuclear engineer.

  • Reply
    John Brightleaf
    April 29, 2018 at 5:59 pm

    Oh that seems like floating fukushima! Is floating plant tsunammi proof? Be a rolling poison bomb now and then if it isn't.

  • Reply
    Giuseppe Molinaro
    April 29, 2018 at 6:29 pm

    What happens if a house fly hits it???

  • Reply
    John O'Neill
    April 29, 2018 at 7:04 pm

    How is this any more dangerous than a nuclear powered submarine or aircraft carrier?

  • Reply
    ms furball
    April 29, 2018 at 7:10 pm

    thank you for this important information !

  • Reply
    Hughjarce153
    April 29, 2018 at 8:23 pm

    Well they built one on the coast of Japan in an area known for earthquakes, I mean what could possibly go wrong?

  • Reply
    Evgeni Antonov
    April 29, 2018 at 8:32 pm

    Interesting. I remember times when scifi authors hoped that nuclear power will change the world. Now it is all about wind. Sad.

  • Reply
    Wanda Alexander
    April 29, 2018 at 9:54 pm

    Hillary's uranium on the move.

  • Reply
    ytor qwerty
    April 29, 2018 at 10:17 pm

    why cant russian stations installa wind turbine?
    seems like a joke or an open threat by russia, but why would russia the superior weapon need to treathen anyone?

  • Reply
    winston smith
    April 29, 2018 at 10:19 pm

    NAW JUST LIKE A NUKE SUB/AIRCRAFT CARRIER

  • Reply
    Hell Raiser
    April 30, 2018 at 4:20 am

    russias mobile nuclear melt down.

  • Reply
    Paul Shearer
    April 30, 2018 at 9:49 am

    WTF is going on in Russia. A nuclear power plant on water and decriminalisation of domestic violence? Something seriously needs to be done about Putin.

  • Reply
    СтАрАеМсЯ
    April 30, 2018 at 10:15 am

    floating nuclear power plant has 5 degrees of protection. Can inhibit a collision with an iceberg, stand the impact of the tsunami, not afraid of fire. The capacity allows to provide electricity to 100,000 people.

  • Reply
    Amun Ah-Moon
    April 30, 2018 at 9:16 pm

    what critics? who are they? no one calls this unique vessel "Floating Chernobyl" but haters in the US, all the US has is 2 obsolete ice breakers which are falling apart and simply can't compete with Russia anymore

  • Reply
    Rad Mage
    May 1, 2018 at 6:15 am

    I have always subscribed to the idea that the establishment has several alternative, clean, renewable energy sources that they hide from the general public. However, when I see a world super power stoop to such a ridiculous solution, I have to wonder about the limitations of the secret power sources or even if world leaders have access to such secrets. At least one nation in possession of such ground breaking renewable energy would say "Screw it! We are losing. Bust out the new energy source to gain an advantage." Yet we don't see this happening. All nations are still using crude power supplies for even our most advanced weaponry. I can see THEM withholding the technology from the public but why is it not being used by THEM (we assume THEM = govt but maybe even govt is out of the loop. Alien overlords?) Perhaps the new tech is only being used off world, fighting wars above our heads for the unclaimed expanse.

  • Reply
    Nelo Carrero
    May 1, 2018 at 4:10 pm

    The name itself 'floating Chernobyl' says it

  • Reply
    Ladybug Sarah
    May 1, 2018 at 9:04 pm

    WHERE ARE YOU? WHY HAVEN'T YOU POSTED LATELY? ITS BEEN 3 DAYS NOW.

  • Reply
    Limey Limowits
    May 2, 2018 at 3:04 am

    Wormwood

  • Reply
    Tim Monroe
    May 2, 2018 at 3:23 am

    Not sure what the big deal is here…. ALMOST every NEW AMERICAN WARSHIP is Nuclear!! Apply all your "what ifs" to those ships too!!

  • Reply
    Ebony Man
    May 2, 2018 at 3:42 am

    The cooling water for this thing comes out of the sea and back into it. It pollutes as it floats. Where are the power lines coming off this thing. What is it powering up?

  • Reply
    collectionneur111
    May 2, 2018 at 6:48 am

    MH-1A was the first floating nuclear power station. Named Sturgis after General Samuel D. Sturgis, Jr., this pressurized water reactor built in a converted Liberty ship was part of a series of reactors in the US Army Nuclear Power Program, which aimed to develop small nuclear reactors to generate electrical and space-heating energy primarily at remote, relatively inaccessible sites. ts designation stood for mobile, high power. After its first criticality in 1967, MH-1A was towed to the Panama Canal Zone that it supplied with 10 MW of electricity from October 1968 to 1975. Russia is only 50 years behind the United States 🙂

  • Reply
    marcelwx
    May 2, 2018 at 12:47 pm

    The nuke boat is owned by Rosatom. The 2010 Uranium deal, Clinton Foundation, Uranium one, Rosatom. Maybe it is a depopulation boat.

  • Reply
    Thomas Jess
    May 2, 2018 at 2:48 pm

    All it takes is one big tidal wave or an iceberg and the Arctic's toast.

  • Reply
    Ken Marchlenski
    May 2, 2018 at 2:50 pm

    Nuclear Accident? Tow it out to sea! Pollute the World instead of Russia directly!
    The Equivalent of having your dog poop in your neighbor's Yard!

  • Reply
    william moore
    May 4, 2018 at 1:09 am

    There's no outlets so it must be a bomb.

  • Reply
    ohitsu stu
    May 4, 2018 at 5:40 pm

    Silly. Shoulda Putin more thought.

  • Reply
    crazy horse
    May 4, 2018 at 8:29 pm

    Floating bomb built for destruction

  • Reply
    Andi
    May 5, 2018 at 2:32 pm

    That's very cool. I hope they will build a lot more of them. 🙂

  • Reply
    Swegn
    May 7, 2018 at 5:31 pm

    Churtanic

  • Leave a Reply