navy

BOMBSHELL: NAVY SEAL CLAIMS THERE WERE MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN LAS VEGAS MASSACRE

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.



SOURCE:
BOMBSHELL: NAVY SEAL CLAIMS THERE WERE MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN LAS VEGAS MASSACRE
Ever since the massacre at Las Vegas took place, millions of Americans have been left with suspicions over the mainstream narrative. Between the logistics, the history of Paddock, and the video footage, things don’t add up—but after this Navy Seal just spoke out, the official story may be debunked for good.

The current narrative is that 64-year-old Stephen Paddock allegedly acted alone, with zero training, and managed to kill 59 people and wound hundreds more. The media claims he just “snapped” one day and decided to go on an all-out shooting spree, but veterans of Delta Force, the Green Berets, and now the Navy Seals seem to disagree.

Craig Sawyer, top ballistics expert and former Navy Seal leader, is confident that there were multiple shooters involved in the Las Vegas Massacre. A federal criminal investigator with a slew of his own high level sources, Sawyer believes that although the echoes may be present, there’s definitely more than one shooter.I will get this caveat out there and it’s very important to be accurate,” he said. “Echoes are very confusing and hearing anything through a microphone is confusing, [but] even though you’re listening to the echoes and even though you’re listening to it after the fact through a microphone…it’s still apparent there was more than one shooter.”

Info Wars reports that he also pointed out the lack of footage of this alleged shooting. Las Vegas hotels and casinos are perhaps the most heavily surveilled locations on the planet, and yet for some reason officials have refused to release any footage—could it be that they’re hiding something?

He also pointed out that so far, there’s hasn’t been much footage released of Stephen Paddock, which suggests the footage would derail the mainstream narrative of a lone shooter.
Remember, Las Vegas hotels and casinos are amongst the most surveilled places per square foot in the world, and yet officials haven’t bothered to release much video. Why wouldn’t surveillance footage be released if it collaborates the official story?
That in itself suggests a cover-up of the parties involved in the shooting – and that the real truth goes much deeper than the mainstream narrative.
If there were multiple shooters, this information needs to be released so the public can help find those responsible.
As we reported on Friday, there’s emerging evidence that the Las Vegas shooting was an ISIS attack and that Paddock had been radicalized, either for real or as part of a cover as he had the hallmarks of an intelligence agency cutout.
Remember, intelligence agencies were behind the rise of ISIS as the CIA and other agencies were funding so-called “moderate” rebels in the Syrian Civil War who were fighting alongside ISIS in an attempt to overthrow President Assad.
Many of these “moderate” rebels later pledged allegiance to ISIS.Others have suggested that the shooting was a cover up for an inside FBI arms deal with ISIS, and although no smoking gun has come to light, the whole situation certainly seems fishy. There’s a lack of footage, a lack of bullet casings, the blood in Paddock’s supposed “suicide” appears to be suspicious, and witnesses have claimed they saw multiple shooters.

THANKS FOR WATCHING MY CHANNEL LASTEST NEWS GLOBAL

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

You Might Also Like

29 Comments

  • Reply
    Dumb Ass
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Don't you get the hint change the voice of the video's narrator people don't like robots voices

  • Reply
    Wanda Roderick
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    yeah and if you check the video there was people on the roof also but nobody said anything about it never even heard if they went up and check the roof for spent shells it's a cover-up Obama and Hillary are behind

  • Reply
    David Agner
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    so "Isis" did the shooting. Well they are getting closer to the truth by telling you that the CIA did this attack. After all aren't Isis and CIA One in the same? The FBI investigation of the CIA, now that's a good one

  • Reply
    Rush Brunette
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Police state!!

  • Reply
    JC ISKING
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    why is ROBO COP giving the details?.dont like this!

  • Reply
    Jim Zawalich
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    FUCKING CLICKBAIT!! >.<

  • Reply
    Joe Ruda
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    We really need a Navy seal to tell us there were numerous firers. The media says the weapons of choice was an AR15. If it was 1 firer, the rounds would have to be belt fed. But since AR15s are magazine fed. There was no break in fire, it was suppressed…..either several firers with multiple AR15s or 1 firer but a m60 machine gun or saw but the only weapons found were ar15s…….multiple firers. A cub scout could tell you this.

  • Reply
    James Tyree
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Computer voice jerk ! Not listening !

  • Reply
    John Schouwenberg
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    putins trolls

  • Reply
    Not Human
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    And you believe this…someone says Navy Seal and you just say to yourself, 'sure…a Navy Seal said it so it must be so'. Right.

  • Reply
    Stev op62
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    FUCK COMPUTER TALK ! BYE BYE !

  • Reply
    Hal Hustis
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    It's easier than that
    Zero shooters
    Zero dead!

  • Reply
    Diane Rioux
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Why don't you let these people to tell their own realizations instead of these ugly voices. So So ANNOYING.

  • Reply
    Tim Sheneman
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Robot voice. Can't be trusted

  • Reply
    Robert Edwards
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    There was at least three if not four Shooters you could tell by the sound of the muzzle blast it was different on different guns not the echo but the original sound

  • Reply
    nantucketjeep
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Ok, first when. Hear robot voice ,I'm out ,!!!

  • Reply
    EYES WIDE OPEN
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    One minute in….robotic voice too annoying….im out.

  • Reply
    OneEyE Monster
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    STOP BEING RETARDED with the ROBOT VOICE…FFS
    There's other poeple just strolling in thats video…aside from the group of people blowning smokes.

  • Reply
    Benjamin Albanese
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    I love robot's but this shits got to go!

  • Reply
    Dan Trusty
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    If a navy seal is saying there were multiple shooters, when we know its a hoax, then this guy is another agent. Special forces agents.

  • Reply
    LendMeYourHand
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    These videos will never get any where. Only no shooter hoax vids are awake.

  • Reply
    Rick O'Shea
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Every time someone uses a robot voice give them a thumbs-down and unsubscribe

  • Reply
    Yahir Gonzales
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    This is true because there’s a clip of the shooting and u can hear 2 separate shootings

  • Reply
    Charles Katz
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    its always believable when the commentary is coming from a computer generated voice….

  • Reply
    Teun Steggink
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Fucking robot, nobody van hear you

  • Reply
    Cary Miller
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Faults Flag

  • Reply
    gary owens
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Why are there no flashes coming from the 32 floor during the shootings?

  • Reply
    Lord Fairplay
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Funny that hundreds of infantrymen say we hear more than one gun firing, we hear a minimum of 3. Yet no one will listen to us, yet when a Naby Sweal says there is more than one shooter then hell yeah lets listen to him. Fuck him and fuck you.

  • Reply
    TexasRose50
    October 22, 2017 at 3:48 am

    Going all the way back to the 70's(if I am recalling correctly), it was Col. Oliver North testifying in a congressional hearing, where I believe he was the first to admit al Quida was invented and funded by the government. During his testimony, was the first time I heard anyone speak about binLaden. And this also was the first I heard about Fast and Furious. I think that's what it was called back then. I may be wrong about that. But he was explaining how the government exchanged guns for drugs. So, corruption gets more dangerous as the years go by. And it will only get worse. But connecting the dots is the only way to see the big picture.

  • Leave a Reply